I would say this is solid "standard" philosophy of science and theology. The metaphor of the book to explain primary and secondary causes is pretty cool (not the first time I encountered it though) but at the same time it raises some questions on other things like the nature of free will and theodicy problems. I wish to know how how the same professor would address them.
Friday, July 13, 2012
God, causality, and time.
Stephen Barr and Alexander Sich at the Science and Faith Conference at the Franciscan University.
I would say this is solid "standard" philosophy of science and theology. The metaphor of the book to explain primary and secondary causes is pretty cool (not the first time I encountered it though) but at the same time it raises some questions on other things like the nature of free will and theodicy problems. I wish to know how how the same professor would address them.
I would say this is solid "standard" philosophy of science and theology. The metaphor of the book to explain primary and secondary causes is pretty cool (not the first time I encountered it though) but at the same time it raises some questions on other things like the nature of free will and theodicy problems. I wish to know how how the same professor would address them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)